Reuters is reporting that Turkey began attacking rebel positions along the Turkey-Iraq border on Friday, and the US has discouraged this move. It seems they think Turkey should seek diplomatic solutions. This is interesting, considering that the primary reason we’re in Iraq ourselves is that we ignored similar advice. Added to that the fact that Turkey actually has a legitimate threat to its national security what with Turkey and Iraq actually sharing a border. It would be interesting to see how Condoleeza Rice would respond to the question of whether or not Turkey should take military options off the table– something the US continually says it will not do when it comes to our difficulties with other far-flung nations like Iran and North Korea, where it unfortunately seems exceedingly likely that we’ll turn our military attention if we ever get ourselves out of Iraq.

The US government has said it’s considering joint action against the PKK, which seems to suggest that they’re not actually opposed to military action as long as we’re the ones running the show.

My own personal experience trying to get bank drafts honored at North Fork Bank, Chase Bank, and others has led to the unfortunate conclusion that several consumer banks in the United States are falsely advertising that they offer checking accounts. As defined by Article 3 of the Uniform Commercial Code, a check is:

(i) a draft, other than a documentary draft, payable on demand and drawn on a bank or (ii) a cashier’s check or teller’s check. An instrument may be a check even though it is described on its face by another term, such as “money order.”

Pay particular attention to the words “payable on demand". North Fork, Chase, and others, however, will not honor any check presented to them unless the person making the presentment also holds an account at their bank. Note that the definition of a “check” does not allow for any such limitation. The instruments these and other such banks offer their account holders, therefore, may be negotiable instruments, but they are not checks. By publicly soliciting consumers for checking account products, they are guilty of false advertising.

All American consumers would do well to review the terms of the negotiable instruments their banks are referring to as “checks". If they will not honor the check when presentment is made by a “person entitled to enforce” without further limitations, then the bank is not providing a true checking account.

Why is this important? Apart from false advertising, which is bad enough, it encourages banks not to hold sufficient actual currency to back all of their accounts. If they only have to give real cash to existing customers, and no one else, then what’s to stop them from keeping little cash on hand at all? You must remember that wire transfers from one bank to another only represent money. American currency is not, itself, electronic. It is dollars and cents. And American banks should not be allowed to substitute the representation of money for the real thing without fully disclosing that to consumers. A “check” is an order to pay real money. To offer anything else and call it a check is a dangerous act of fraud.